— Local Organizations —

Lupus Canada In Action

Click on the logos for details

Lupus Canada Walk A Block
Check out our upcoming events
Lupus Canada Fact Sheet
Get Involved with Lupus - Volunteer
Donate Now to help Conquer Lupus


Lupus Canada Advokit

Case Law

(Note: These comments are for general information only. Legal advice should be obtained regarding specific situations.)

This section is designed to provide an idea of how judges of various courts and commissioners of human rights tribunals have protected the rights of people with an illness or a disability. The case examples in this section don't all deal with lupus, but they give us an idea about how the legal system can work for people with disabilities and chronic conditions.

Case Law, or legal precedents, provides the system with principles to base its decisions on. The more similar a new case is to a previous case, the more likely it is that the outcome will be the same.

No two cases are ever exactly alike, though, just as no two people with lupus have exactly the same symptoms. Each decision a judge or commissioner makes is based on the specific facts of the case. A difference of even one or two facts may result in a very different decision.

There is no way of knowing for certain what a commissioner or judge will decide, but if you have a case in which you feel that you ought to receive compensation or relief, you certainly should look into the possibility of taking legal action.

If, for example, you have been refused work, fired from a job or discriminated against, you could seriously consider consulting a lawyer. It is very possible that the action taken against you can be corrected and you might be awarded monetary damages for that wrong.

If you want to take the issue to court, support is available. In a court of law, a lawyer is the advocate. In many cases, a lawyer will give you a free consultation upon request. You can also consult a legal clinic, or the local Bar Association can tell you where to go for advice.

Discrimination in Hiring

Mr. K. McKenzie was refused employment as a miner because he was an insulin-dependent diabetic.

His diabetes was stable and under control. Work in a mine, with its harsh environmental conditions and long hours, would be no harder on him than on a non-diabetic miner.

By refusing him the job without assessing his individual ability to perform the tasks of the job, the employer had discriminated against Mr. McKenzie.

The company was ordered to give him a job and if it refused to do so, the Council would hear further arguments about compensation.

Reference: Kevin McKenzie v. Quintets Coal Limited, Canadian Human Rights Reporter, Volume 8, Decision 601, paras 29729 - 29817 (February/ March 1987)

Lupus triggered by auto accident - damages awarded

In a recent Ontario decision, a woman who had been healthy and fit prior to an automobile accident but who suffered from lupus after it, was awarded considerable damages.

The Court held that in all probability, the lupus was triggered by the accident.

Reference: Larivee v LaFrance, Ontario Court General Division, Action No. 96 334 024 (Mr. Justice R. P. Boissinneault)

Discrimination in Hiring

Mr. R. Henderson applied to BC Transit for a bus driver's job, but was refused when his medical exam showed that he had Crohn's Disease.

The BC Counsel of Human Rights found that BC Transit had discriminated against Mr. Henderson by denying him the position. It ordered BC Transit to offer him the next available job, with seniority from the date of the original refusal.

Also, it ordered that he be paid an amount equal to what he would have earned between that date and the date of hearing, minus what he had earned in any other occupation in the interim. He was also awarded $1500 compensation for humiliation and injury to self esteem.

Reference: Robert G. Henderson v. BC Transit, Canadian Human Rights Reporter, Vol 18, Decision 9, paras 1-76 (May 1992)

Discrimination on the Job

Ms. Maren Engell had multiple sclerosis. In 1984, after a year working as an occupational therapist for with Mount Sinai Hospital, her multiple sclerosis worsened. She was absent from work for several months and then returned. She worked full-time for three months but then began to experience severe nausea because she was pregnant. She was unable to work and asked to take vacation leave to visit relatives.

Her vacation leave was denied on the grounds that she had been absent too often because of her health. She was told that if she went on vacation, her employment would be terminated. She went on holiday and the hospital fired her.

An Ontario Board of Inquiry under the Ontario Human Rights Code found that her vacation leave was denied because of absenteeism caused by her disability. People with disabilities are entitled to the same employment benefits as other employees, including vacations.

The hospital violated the Human Rights Code when it denied Ms. Engell vacation leave and fired her. The hospital was ordered to pay her $7,200 for lost wages and $1,000 to compensate her for the injury to her dignity and self respect and the loss of her right of freedom from discrimination. The hospital was ordered to remove the notation of "dismissal" from her personnel file and to issue a letter of recommendation for future employment.

Reference: Maren Engell v. Mount Sinai Hospital, Canada Human Rights Reporter, Volume 11, Decision 8, paras 1-53, (January 1990).


 
Home About Us Living with Lupus Events Resources News Room/Public Awareness Get Involved Donate Now Online Boutique

Lupus Canada is federally registered as a nonprofit charity in Canada (# 11902 5872 RR0001).
Lupus Canada does not offer medical service or advice. The material found on, or accessed
through this web site is intended for educational and informational purposes only.
Copyright © 2008 - 2011 All rights reserved.

Web Design: InSite Creations